'Making a killing\r'

'In an unfortunate pillow slip Blackwater guards killed three civilians of Baghdad who were mistaken as terrorists. What is in the scenario is the strong reaction of the new Iraki government. The contiguous 24 hours saw the process of deportment of the troop. It was inform that there was indiscriminate shooting and this is realisedly an abysmal error. According to Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki this was a complete criminal act. However there be legion(predicate) in allegations against Blackwater and it is desired that they smuggle arms into Iraq. There is enough disarray in the region and it back well be stated that further problems can be avoided to reanimate peace in the region. (Scahill, 1)\r\nIt can be remembered that from each one of the wars accommodated major and minor battles.  They had varying and trenchant reasons behind them.  Allies and foes were distinctly different in each case. Each of the wars had a level of analysis.  These levels were aboutbo dy state, and system.  The levels of war analysis form a power structure.  The responsibilities of the hierarchy rely on the scale and temperament of the operation.\r\nThe various(prenominal) level of analysis in war includes a basic idea of how man traits ca use of goods and services many a(prenominal) of the social essences in historical instances, including war and peace. From the sentiment of sociology it can be stated that there atomic number 18 variations of this idea as listed in a reputation written by Wade L. Huntley, Ph.D. titled Causes of war and Paths to Peace written in May of 2004.\r\nThose variations include: basic human nature, varying features of human nature and both perception and misperception. His forecastations behind this would include that in factoring basic human nature, people ar basically aggressive, loving, greedy and fearful and so forth. people would be of all sorts of typewrites, some aggressive, some others peaceful, greedy or gene rous. Perception and misperception can result as high-risk decisions are made, especially in times of stress, which continually exemplifies the limits of human understanding of more than just human nature.\r\nThe incident in Iraq, as depicted by Scahill is basically a view that was conducted from the US bode of view the views or the sociological parameters of the residents of Iraq are basically overlooked in the article. (King, 145-7)\r\nIt can well be stated that some analysts argue that democracy in the Middle East provide elevate Islamists, including radicals, who will use parliamentary institutions to gain power exclusively then implement their autocratic agenda. Democracy can also lead to instability. In short, things may find out worse before they get better, which may be bad news for the US. Many however believe that in the long run increased democratic governance or the break up of atmospherics autocracies will lead to a better outcome than the status quo even if th e emerging governments initially countervail U.S. policies.\r\nSome furthermore argue that any type of somewhat democratic government would find more common ground with the U.S. than the existing ones even if balancing was gradual and difficult. But from the point of view of an Iraqi it can be stated that independence is all that is relevant and it can be mentioned that Scahill was unable to link himself to this consequence.\r\nTraditional earnest policy emphasizes military instrument for reducing the risks of war and for prevailing if deterrence fails. homophile security’s proponents, speckle not eschewing the use of force, scram focused to a much greater degree on non-coercive approaches. These range from preventive diplomacy, impinge management and postâ€conflict peace building, to addressing the lineage causes of conflict by building state potentiality and promoting equitable economic development.  The new dimensions of human security are well outlined by the fall in Nations information Program in their Human Development Report of 1994. (Lamb, 288-9)\r\nHuman Security has always been at issue in some format or another. You see it in the methods employed during peacetime and during war time. The methodological analysis utilized might in fact be different from generation to generation, but the concept itself has just now managed to evolve into something other than what its basics stem from. The pursuits of lifetime and liberty, happiness and peace have been a set forth of the psyche of humanity since the beginnings of human existence and it would have been much better if the article had developed on these principals.\r\nKeeping in mind the developments in Iraq the only when resoluteness the USA is left with is one that just about people connected to the White House consider absolute anathema. But the truth remains that a military ‘solution’ to the issue is no solution at all but rather a spiralling tunnel leading to a thousand other issues, all of which are far too mordacious to be contemplated. So what can USA do?\r\nWell, for starters it can seriously rethink some of its modern policies and shift its focus from military attack to some old fashioned diplomacy instead. But while that sounds simple enough for Washington it is a business organization unparalleled in its difficulty and, if present indications are anything to go by then, something that is hardly likely to travel by and Scahill as a journalist must bound his position as humane and compassionate as possible in this context.\r\nWorks Cited:\r\nScahill, Jeremy; Making a Killing; The Nation; October 15, 2007 issue; September 27, 2007; retrieved on 24.11.2007\r\nKing, Herbert. Middle East Today Vol. IV Plymouth: HBT & amp; Brooks Ltd. 2005\r\nLamb, Davis. Cult to Culture: The Development of culture on the Strategic Strata. Wellington\r\n'