Mandatory Human Chip Implants Essay

The idea of mandatory human divide implants is wrong on so many different levels. non totally is there a major concern around how it will sham the privacy of caller, but also how much we dont experience about the adverse effects on the actual human body. other major concern is the overt backlash that after part be expect from all religious bodies and communities. This is why we as a society essential ache up for what we believe is right, and what is right is that mandatory human scarper implants give the sacknot and will not be tolerated.One of the biggest issues with mandatory human escape implants is privacy issues and concerns. Many questions immediately come up whenever the topic arises. What government activity or body of government controls the data stored from these stops? Is the nurture stored in the break short safe and secure? Can my information be stolen and or interchange? As of right now the only second approved for public in a medical application is the Verichip. The Verichip is a chip corresponding to the size of a grain of rice. It is a fairly simple gubbins that consists of only a coiled wire and a hermetically squiffy microchip inside a glass casing. It uses the coil as an overture to create a radio preindication that is unique. This unique signal kindle be transmitted and received to identify a persons medical records if they atomic number 18 in nigh sort of dire utter in which they could not communicate efficiently.(Foster, Kenneth R. 2007,March)This could save so many lives in the medical field simply by pulling up a patients records and receiving this signal. In a perfect world this would blend correctly and only for good intentions but, the way we as a society constantly strive to streamline every aspect of our purport, where would it stop? The smell or idea is that it would replace drivers licenses or marge atm and debit cards. Social security numbers, birth certificates, bank accounting numbers, basic ally your entire life. As technology continues to grow and advance, how secure can these chips truly be? If someone was able to steal your signal they would be able to do so many things with the information stored in it. Your life would be stolen in the blink of an eye. Also, another terrifying realization is if the signal is stolen or locked on to, you could be followed or tracked. This is very unsettling if we cannot be incontestable how safe this information really is. Would you really want someoneto realize where you or your loved ones are at all times? What if some sick individual was watching your child or children? The possibilities are timeless in these scenarios. So with no guarantee on how secure the information stored in these chips really is, this is one of the many reasons why there should not be mandatory human chip implants.Another strong contestation point on this topic is health concerns. With these devices being as lower-ranking as they are, there is not eno ugh data to prove that they are not a health concern. There is lots of data about these chips that should raise some eyebrows, as substantially as the manner in which they were approved by the FDA. Back in 2005 when the FDA approved human chip implants they claimed with reasonable assurance the device was safe. The one thing they failed to mention in that claim was that studies going back to the mid-nineties directly links these chip implants with cancer. Many studies and interrogation showed that one in six lab rats essential tumors because of the engraft chip. So how could this slip by the FDA you ask? According to Lewan (2007), well back in 2005 when it was brought beforehand the FDA for approval, the head of the Department of Health and merciful Services at the time which presided over the FDA, was a man by the name of Tommy Thompson. Well two weeks after the approval of the chip in humans, Thompson left his position at the DHHS to become a board member of VeriChip Corp. and Applied Digital Solutions. Even though it was five months later, he was correct with cash and stock options from the companies. Can we chalk this up as a coincidence? I dont think so. With all the facts and research done on this particular subject I find it sturdy to believe that the FDA did not come across any of this information before approving human chip implants. So with the data already in front of us claiming to link these chips with cancer in lab rats, can we honestly agree to be implanted ourselves?Finally, the thought or feel of human chip implants would cause a huge backlash in our religious communities. Just recently in Virginia, there was a public outcry against mandatory micro-chipping that caused the star sign of Representatives to vote on the subject matter. Krunkle , (2010) wrote, Del. class L. loot (R-Fredericksburg), the bills sponsor, is quoted saying My understanding Im not a theologian but theres a prophecy in the Biblethat says youll have to receiv e a mark, or you can neither buy nor sell things in end times, Cole said. Some nation think these computer chips might be that mark.(p.1) In our society, religion is at times, a very controversial and touchy subject matter between religious communities. There will be millions of people who will become distraught if human chip implants become mandatory. Our orbit has so many different religious cultures that it would directly effect. Are we really ready for the consequences that will follow if this eventually happens?In conclusion, we as a society need to stand up to what we consider right from wrong. So is it wrong to make someone have a chip implanted so they can buy or sell things in ensnare for them to survive even though it goes against their religious beliefs? Or is it wrong for these chips to be approved for humans even though there is substantial demonstrate that it could cause cancer. The answer is entirely up to us. My conclusion is that yes, it is completely wrong. Not only does it violate our ethical privacy rights as human beings, it also causes so many concerns medically and spiritually. We cannot allow this to come to fruition. We have to stand up for ourselves and our beliefs and say no to mandatory human chip implants to cheer our future generations to come.ReferencesFoster, Kenneth R (2007, March) The murky ethics of implanted chips. IEEE spectrum. Retrieved from http//pages.cs.wisc.edu/markhill/cs252/Spring2013/handouts/spectrum07_rfid_ethics.pdf Holtzman, David H (2008). charitable ID chips get under my skin, BusinessWeek Online, 5-5(1). Krunkle, Frederick (2010). Human chips seen by some in Virginia House as device of antichrist, The Lewan, Todd (2007). Chip implants linked to animal tumors, The Washington postal service Washington Post