In what ways was Napoleon a warrior overloard in his Treatment of his subjects? :: European Europe History

In what ship canal was Napoleon a warrior overloard in his Treatment of his subjects?The question asks what was Napoleons treatment of his European subjects. However basic we need to learn what these subjects were and distinguish the differences between them. The states of the heroic Empire fell into one of two categories - lands annexed directly to France, or satallite states down the stairs French control but allegedly enjoying a modicum of independence. The extent of Napoleons crook varied, depending on the length of time a particular country remained under his authority. Examples of annexed territories be Nice,Savoy, Belguim and the Germanlands west of the Rhine. These were annexed early (pre 1800) and had were quickly incorporated into the French administrative system, however these states were mainly divided into divisions for recruitment purposes. By the time of the Brumaire fuedalism as in France had been abolished in these territories. Also land belonging to the nobili ty or church were either confiscated or sold. All the annexed states were ruled from Paris and were regarded as extensions of the old France. All new French policies were introduced like the civil code and the discriminative process of civil and ccriminal courts. A semi circle of nominally autarkical satellite states, were mainly run by Napoleons relatives, formed a buffer zone some France. These states protected the boarders of the French empire from any attack. Some examples of satellite states are Switzerland, Spain, Naples and Italy. These satellite states, allegedly independent, infact had little frredom of action. Their rulers were strictley supervised and tutored by Napoleon in the way they should go. The satellite states was very different. They were never allowed to forget that they existed only to servicing the intrests of France. Napoleonwanted them to fullfill a number of other valuable functions in Napoleons imperial enterprise. They were first and foremost military vassal states and Napoleons relationship with themwas eventually wery like that of a warrior-overlord, extracting the advantage from them for the minimum return. These states raised about a third of the phalanx for the Grand Armee. The distribution of crowns among Napoleons relatives served two purposes for him. One of the two was that they would remain true to him no matter what. Also, with such a large number of nap sovereigns available he could expect in due course to groom useful marriage alliances with older royal houses and give his successors the dynastic respectability the family presently lacked.