College Athletes Must be Held to the Same Standards as Full-Time Studen

Despite a tendency for groundworks to be lenient with college athletes, as they respect the benefits of full-time-student status, they must be held to the same standards as non-athlete students. Every institution has an covenant to set attendance rules students who attend these institutions welcome an obligation to abide by them, however, in actuality, professors chose whether or not theyre enforced. This may cause material problems between other students targeting a player, rather than who is responsible, the Professor. Although institutions want their students equally treated, assortment is well accepted. Existence as a college athlete contributes to diversity as well as a substantial amount of favoritism. Issues arise pertaining to how cardinal may view an institution as well as the institution itself, imputable to an athletes gift. Though athletics contribute to a decrease in anxiety and stress, in some cases, facts show otherwise. Furthermore, all(prenominal) institution has a set of rules pertaining to attendance policies, that every student, including athletes need to follow. closely institutions have similar attendance polices. Their policies include attending regular classes on time, fully comprehending the syllabus for every class, prompt notice to teacher regarding absences due to competition and/or travel, once a certain amount of age have been missed the student is dropped, and failure to properly communicate with instructor may result in a failing grade. Policies have hold the student-athlete is fully responsible for communicating with their professors regarding their attendance. They have also acknowledged students atomic number 18 not entitled to a certain number of absences. Most importantly, policies have stated the importance of in... ...Q Educause every quarter.NDP. Web. 28 November 2011. Educause Quarterly Magazine, Volume 30, Number 2. 2007.www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/clickerintheclassroom anactive/157458Pros, Cons on pay for play yahoo. USA Today. 31 August 2004. Web. 25 November 2014. www.usatoday.com/sports/2004-08-31-pros-cons-pay_x.htmTaylor, Donald L. A Comparison Of College Athletic Participants And Nonparticipants Of Self-Esteem. Journal Of College Student Development 36.5 (1995) 444-51. ERIC. Web. 12 Dec. 2014.Student Athlete Class Attendance Policy JEFFCO. Viking Intercollegiate Athletics. 14 October 2011. Web. 25 November 2014. Jefferson College Policy.www.jeffco.edu.edu/athletics/inex.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=287&Itemid=256Worsnop, Richard L. College Sports. CQ Researcher 26 Aug. 1994 745-68. Web. 12 Dec. 2014.