Principle of Convergence and the Theme of Disempowerment Essay

The belief of Convergence and the Theme of DisempowermentIn this paper, I propose to present interpretations of half-dozen whole kit and caboodle by French artists,three painters (Watteau, Delacroix, and Manet) and three novelists (Zola, Proust, andCamus), and to report on the unexpected discovery (if it deserves to be called such) thatthese disparate works moderate received principles of structuring in common.Let us eliminate from the outset a practicable source of distraction these studies areinterdisciplinary in fibre, but that seems to have nothing to do with the discoveriesmade.One way to throw light on the meaning of a novel or a painting is to take care it inthe light of a concept drawn from another discipline. so the various modes of geomorphologicalism borrowed from structural linguistics, either directly (e.g. via certaingerminal works of Roman Jakobson, such as his famous essay on metaphor andmetonymy) or indirectly (e.g. as mediated by the structural anthropology of ClaudeLvi-Strauss). Such is the nature of interdisciplinary research. It is especially appropriateand rich when a key element or a central cheek of a text has manifestly not given upits secrets to either of the traditional or conventional modes of analysis.In analyzing these works, I have had resort to psychology, psychoanalysis,transactional analysis, group behaviour theory, feminism and control theory. However,the discovery I am presenting does not appear to depend in any way on theinterdisciplinary character of the perspectives used. Rather, it depends on the plausibilityof the interpretation and the central character of the aspects of the work being interpreted.Complexity in LEmbarquement pour Cythere. The fancy is generallythough... ...often withoutany obvious link between these two features having been spy previously, isunexpected, both for the art critic and the literary critic. Equally intriguing is thediscovery that each of the works we have examined here leads the viewer/reader done a two-part drama of disempowerment and re-empowerment that takes verydifferent forms but in its sum of money recurs over and over again. As far as I know, this has neer even been suspected by any critic or historian.It would be very interesting to know just how many great works of art andliterature can be better understood in the light of such concepts or clusters of concepts asthose used here.When we have famed that all these works appear to represent variations on oneand the analogous drama, we are left with an intriguing question that remains to beanswered do they all have the same function?